The Book of Universes
John D. Barrow
Having read it
★★★★☆
Littered with great quotes (from many, including Eric Cantona and Douglas Adams) that lighten the insightfully questioning and revealing theoretical details, this book is surprisingly accessible despite its subject and the information and ideas that come along for the ride; apart from the many letters and numbers making up quite a few formulae (and the numbers involved for one explainer being something like a billion photons for every atom!) alongside the pictures, diagrams and illustrations, this book about different ways of explaining a universe (or two!) and maybe figuring out more clearly the workings of the one we’re in, is pretty good.
The author’s clear skill at explaining the many concepts about our universe (hence the book’s title) is good and for the non-cosmologists and non-mathematicians among us it represents a decent addition to the broader conversation and commentary about our universe... or that one over there... no, hang on, it’s that one, that braneworld, not the wannabe ring doughnut-style one... that’s a bit inside out and back to front, but only when you look at it from afar and at certain times, like when it’s upside down through a mirror... right?
Still, like G. H. Hardy is quoted in the book...
Imaginary universes are so much more beautiful than this stupidly constructed ‘real’ one.
Anyway, time: what’s that all about? Given it might just be an arbitrary concept partially assisting cosmological inflation that will inevitably lead to universal delivery services taking even longer than they do already, light included, why bother worrying about being late?
There are only certain intervals of time when life of any sort is possible in an expanding universe and we can practise astronomy only during that habitable time interval in cosmic history.
[...] For [Paul] Dirac, life wasn’t confined to a short interval of cosmic history: his faith was that its future was unlimited.
Here are some more words, by the book’s author, to conclude my review...
Finally a sobering and tantalising thought: we feel dismayed or sceptical about the very idea of infinite replication. It seems fantastic, ridiculous and impossible in equal measure. But all around us there are replicas that we habitually assume to be perfect. The world is made of them. Protons, electrons, quarks, all these elementary particles of Nature come in families of identical particles. Once you’ve seen one electron, you’ve seen them all.52 No one knows why that is so. The universe is based upon replication and we suspect this replication will be infinite, just like the expanding universe appears to be. This is the most fantastic fine tuning of all. Most physicists don’t even notice it and few ever comment on it. It suggests the deep-laid fabric of reality has replication at its heart.
A good passage
The most interesting consequence of inflation is that the period of faster accelerated expansion enables the whole of the visible part of the universe today (extending more than 14 billion light years across) to have expanded from a far smaller primordial fluctuation of mass and energy than was previously imagined to be possible – a fluctuation small enough to be kept smooth by light rays moving from one side to another.18 The high level of smoothness we observe in our universe is therefore just a reflection of the fact that in an inflationary universe the whole visible universe is the expanded image of a tiny fluctuation that is kept smooth and isotropic by photons of light moving excess energy from the hotter parts to the cooler parts.
A second good passage
Cosmologists have long appreciated that there is a surprisingly close link between the large-scale properties of the universe and the existence of life within it. At first sight this might appear odd. The universe is big. There are countless stars and galaxies extending billions of light years in every direction. How could any of that have a connection with us, here and now, orbiting an average star in an unremarkable galaxy?
The unexpected connection arises because the expansion of the universe links time and space. Chemical elements like carbon, oxygen and silicon that produce the complex structures on which ‘life’ is based do not appear ready-made in the universe when it starts expanding. Nor are they made during the primordial nucleosynthesis of deuterium, helium and lithium during the first three minutes of the universe’s history. Rather, they are made in the stars over billions of years through a sequence of nuclear reactions that first combine two helium nuclei to make beryllium, then add another to make carbon, then another to make oxygen, and so on. These processes take place as stars die and the elements they produce are spread around the universe when the dying stars explode as supernovae. Eventually, they find their way into dust and rubble that condenses into planets, and then find their way into molecules and people.
The production of carbon and steady hydrogen-burning stars like our Sun that sustain life-supporting environments needs billions of years of stellar alchemy to take place. This is why we should not be surprised to find that our universe is so old. It takes lots of time to produce the chemical building blocks needed for any type of complexity. And because the universe is expanding, if it is old, it must also be big – billions of light years in extent. If the universe were just the size of the Milky Way galaxy, with its 100 billion stars offering potential homes for planetary systems, it might seem room enough for lots of life. But such an economy-sized universe would be little more than a month old. No time for stars to evolve or for the building blocks of biochemical complexity to be formed.
A third good passage
Given the problems of environmental degradation created by advanced technological species, and the exhaustion of natural resources, we might expect that very advanced civilisations would have to move towards becoming technologically miniaturised. The state of advancement of a civilisation would be better gauged by its ability to engineer at smaller and smaller scales, rather than on larger and larger ones. Accordingly, one can classify civilisations according to their ability to manipulate molecules, atoms, elementary particles and space-time structure.56 This means that the more advanced they become, the less visible are their technological activities because they use less energy and create smaller and smaller amounts of waste heat. Even their space probes might be no larger than clusters of atoms or molecules. We would not even notice them.